Bishops Visit Texas Detention Facility, Call for an End to Detention of Families
Police at Dilley Detention Center
In August 2014 we wrote about the plight of refugee children arriving in the US from Central America. See Refugee Children: Humanitarian Crisis. Catholic and Lutheran bishops visited the Dilley Detention Center in Dilley, Texas on March 27 to observe conditions there first hand. This concentration camp facility is designed to hold women and children for long periods of time as their cases move slowly through the immigration court system. The bishops issued the following statement:
WASHINGTON—Catholic and Evangelical Lutheran bishops visited with young mothers and children who have fled violence in their home countries and are now incarcerated at Dilley Detention Center in Dilley, Texas, on March 27. The faith leaders called upon the federal government to halt the practice of family detentions, citing the harmful effects on mothers, children and the moral character of society.
Dilley detention center guard tower
Archbishop Gustavo García-Siller of San Antonio, Texas, whose archdiocese includes Dilley, was joined by Bishop Eusebio Elizondo, auxiliary bishop of Seattle, and Bishop James Tamayo of Laredo, Texas. Bishops Michael Rinehart and H. Julian Gordy of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America also joined them on the visit. Since last summer, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has detained hundreds of families at detention centers in New Mexico, Texas, and Pennsylvania, under a new family detention policy aimed at families fleeing violence in Central America.
“Why do we feel compelled to place in detention such vulnerable individuals – traumatized young mothers with children?”
“After this visit, my primary question is: Why? Why do we feel compelled to place in detention such vulnerable individuals –traumatized young mothers with children fleeing persecution in their home countries?” said Archbishop García-Siller following the visit. “A great nation such as ours need not incarcerate the most vulnerable in the name of deterrence. The moral character of a society is judged by how it treats the most vulnerable in our midst. Our nation’s family detention policy is shameful and I implore our elected officials to end it.”
Bishop Elizondo, chairman of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ (USCCB) Committee on Migration, added: “The detention of families serves no purpose and undermines due process. It especially harms children, who experience emotional and psychological harm from detention. The policy is a stain on the administration’s record on immigration.”
Bishop James Tamayo of Laredo, Texas, said humane alternatives to detention exist and should be used for the population.
“The government should consider placing these families in humane alternatives to detention, where they could live in the community and access needed services, including legal representation,” Bishop Tamayo said. “The Church is ready to assist in this effort.”
More than 75 Catholic and Lutheran bishops and Jewish rabbis sent sent the following letter to President Obama …
“These families are not a threat to our communities …”
“As people of faith, we are guided by admonitions to care for and protect children”
March 26, 2015
As faith leaders representing churches, synagogues, and faith-based organizations in the United States who are deeply committed to upholding this country’s moral leadership to protect children and the sanctity of the family, we call on you to end the harsh policy of family detention and employ alternatives to detention where deemed necessary. We believe this practice to be inhumane and harmful to the physical, emotional, and mental well-being of this vulnerable population.
We also believe that it is inappropriate and unjust to seek to deter anyone, especially a woman and her children, from fleeing violence in their homeland to seek safe haven in the United States. A recent decision by the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., which issued an injunction halting the detention of families, agreed with this assessment, concluding that a strategy of deterrence does not warrant the deprivation of individual liberty.
As people of faith, we are guided by admonitions to care for and protect children. Studies have shown that detention has a harmful psychological effect on children, in which they grow despondent, lose weight, and do not advance in their intellectual or emotional growth. Detention also undermines family bonds and parental authority. Moreover, children and their parent(s) have already experienced trauma on their journey, with many of the women having endured sexual violence. Placing survivors of violence in detention only adds to their trauma and sense of insecurity. It also subjects them to possible further emotional or physical abuse.
These families are not a threat to our communities—they pose no risk to our safety and have committed no crimes. They are themselves fleeing real forms of terror, with a majority having valid asylum claims. While in detention they have less ability to access counsel to help them with their claims, leaving them without due process protections. Their detention also hinders the ability to gather evidence of their persecution, diminishing their chances of obtaining protection.
Instead of incarcerating these vulnerable families, we urge you to reconsider the need to detain them and release them on their recognizance or explore other alternatives, such as placement in a community-based case management program.
Mr. President, detaining mothers and babies who come to this country in search of refuge from violence and abuse is morally troubling. The Bible is very clear—we are called to welcome the stranger. We ask you to consider whether you are prepared for your legacy to include the purposeful detention of innocent mothers and babies in furthering an ineffective policy of deterrence that violates fundamental tenants of our faiths and the American ideal of providing freedom and refuge to the persecuted. The incarceration of vulnerable mothers and children fleeing violence in their home countries is a stain on the record of this Administration.
We urge you to reverse course on this policy and implement alternatives for all families in immigration detention which are humane and uphold the human rights of this vulnerable population. Our faith communities are ready and willing to welcome and assist families seeking refuge.
<signed by more than 75 Catholic and Lutheran bishops and Jewish rabbis>
Today we pictorially visit Little Angels School in Ichama, Benue State, Nigeria, where HVM Srs. Calista and Helen serve as headmistress and teachers. We join them on Thursday, March 13, in a day of school-wide sports competitions. Students organized by “house” (think Harry Potter) competed in football, long jump, foot races and table tennis. Join the fun! May your smile be as big as the smiles on the faces of the children.
From Headmistress Sr. Calista Iwu’s opening address: “Undoubtedly, this event today which involves games and competition encompasses more than just the drama and excitement of a sporting competion. It also develops pride and self-confidence in school and fosters a healthy competitive culture through a wide range of sporting and cultural activities.”
Your generosity, along with fundraising by 1st grade students at Holy Name School in Birmingham, MI, helps orphaned children in Ichama attend Little Angels School and participate in school activites such as these. See Letters from Ichama.
Sr. Helen makes last minute decorations
Yellow House Team
Green House Team
Some parents in attendance
Blue House Team (winning smile @ front center)
Red House Team
Bishop Michael Apochi and parish laity chairman
Dark Blue House team marching
Long Jump sprint
Bishop Michael Apochi, Bishop, Cth. Diocese of Otukpo – Opening Mass
Mr. Jesse Cox, MTh, MDiv, is the Director of Campus Ministry at Marygrove College. He delivered the following presentation at the February 14 meeting of the new “Faith in Detroit” group comprised of women and men religious committed to social justice in Detroit.
An abbreviated version of this thought-provoking statement appeared in the Easter 2015 edition of the SHVM print newsletter The Visitor. This is the full text version – perhaps somewhat long for a typical web posting. Many of us often don’t take the time to read long web articles because we’ve grown accustomed to quick phrases and entertaining photos on our computer screens. But read this article in it’s entirety. It talks to us about facts and issues that form an important part of our lives. I talks to us about change. It talks to us about truth.
RACE MADE A DIFFERENCE
When I was in the first grade I attended St. Columbanus Catholic School on the Southeast side of Chicago. We were exclusively an African American Catholic bubble because even though the school was staffed by Adrian Dominicans and even though the priests were white as were most of the sisters [we did have one Black sister at our school, Sr. Martin Thomas [Sr. Jamie Phelps]. The parish was predominately Black. In the second grade, when our family moved to be closer to my mother’s family, I helped integrate, unbeknownst to me, Visitation Catholic School on the Southwest side of the city.
I wasn’t aware of any problems because children of a certain age don’t see color or make distinctions regarding race. So being the subversive I was I made friends. One boy and I became close friends and we played every day together at recess. His name was Steven Keifer. My birthday is in April and I wanted to invite him and a few of my schoolmates to my birthday party. I remember giving Steven an invitation and the next day he told me he couldn’t come. And when I asked him why he told me his mom just told him no. I remember also telling my mother about my disappointment. I think she already knew the deal, but she told me to ask Steven’s mother if she was willing, my mother would pick him up and also bring him back home again. It sounded reasonable to me. So the next day I walked with Steven back to his house and he ran up the stairs to get his mom and I, from the bottom of the stairs, parroted what my mother had said to me; that she was willing to pick Steven up and drop him off too-if she would give him permission to come to my party. She said no again. And vaguely I remember Steven, from behind his mother shrug his shoulders, as if he didn’t understand as I turned to walk back home. No one from my second grade class attended my birthday party. As close as we were physically – we were worlds apart.
This experience shaped my understanding of the issues surrounding racial differences. It also informed my understanding of how Catholics in my neighborhood reacted: flight! Because soon after that, the population of the school changed from an Irish Catholic community to an African American and Latino [mostly Puerto Rican] community.
That is my first conscious remembrance of an experience of the suspicion and fear that divided people in my parish. And it was, as I reflect back over my racial history, the first time I knew I was infected by the sin of racism.
It was nothing we ever talked about as a parish, in fact Msgr. Wolfe said from the pulpit one Sunday that “The Black Sheep are not mine.” We talked about each other but we never committed to ourselves to the hard work or engaging in conversation and healthy dialogue. A break through happened for me when I first heard the term, “The Beloved Community.”
THE BELOVED COMMUNITY
On the King Center website it states: “The Beloved Community” is a term that was first coined in the early days of the 20th Century by the philosopher-theologian Josiah Royce, who founded the Fellowship of Reconciliation. However, it was Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., also a member of the Fellowship of Reconciliation, who popularized the term and invested it with a deeper meaning which has captured the imagination of people of goodwill all over the world.
For Dr. King, The Beloved Community was not a lofty Utopian goal to be confused with the rapturous image of the Peaceable Kingdom, in which lions and lambs coexist in idyllic harmony. Rather, The Beloved Community was for him a realistic, achievable goal that could be attained by a critical mass of people committed to and trained in the philosophy and methods of nonviolence.
Dr. King’s Beloved Community is a global vision, in which all people can share in the wealth of the earth. In the Beloved Community, poverty, hunger and homelessness will not be tolerated because international standards of human decency will not allow it. Racism and all forms of discrimination, bigotry and prejudice will be replaced by an all-inclusive spirit of sisterhood and brotherhood. In the Beloved Community, international disputes will be resolved by peaceful conflict-resolution and reconciliation of adversaries, instead of military power. Love and trust will triumph over fear and hatred. Peace with justice will prevail over war and military conflict.
It’s a given that we are in the world, but how we are in the world, or better yet, how are we in relationship in the world? That is the key question! It’s very evident that in the United States there seems to be a growing divide between those on one hand who possess power and want to use that power to further their own access to money, influence and an intolerance toward those who disagree with them, especially those of another race, nationality, religion, gender or sexual orientation. Then on the other hand there are those who use their power to break down oppressive, intolerant and self-serving systems. They share power, dismantle unyielding hierarchies and invite the feminine perspective to one sided patriarchies and create room for same gender loving people. Creating the beloved community begins, as the prophet Micah says with “acting justly, loving mercy and to walking humbly with God” It begins with us getting and sharing as the singer Patti LaBelle sang, “A New Attitude!” It is a constant renewal and opening of our minds to ask the question again and again, when decisions are made, when important facts need to be ratified, when rumors or misinformation is shared-before we make a final decision we need to ask “who’s not in the room, who’s missing?” So that when we make a decision that is competent and compassionate it reflects the most inclusive process we can make.
Creating the beloved community means admitting the enemy is within and the enemy is within the room. Part of “A New Attitude,” is being honest and open with ourselves. Sometimes we have to admit that we are part of the problem, we are a hindrance to change, and we are blocking the doorway to something new or keeping others out.
Another important realization for me is learning to work with and rub elbows with people who I previously might have labeled as my enemy. As long as I’m filled with hatred for another I block the progress for the formation of the Beloved Community [at least in terms of my participation in it!] I am called to live nonviolently and more inclusively in the world.
LISTEN AND ENGAGE
I am encouraged by your group (the “Faith in Detroit” group), by your commitment to having conversations across racial divides, that you are asking and seeking answers to the hard questions, that the status quo is not your benchmark and that you are meeting to be and to give birth to the beloved community in the areas under your influence. I use the ‘giving birth’ metaphor purposefully, because it is painful, risky and your blood, sweat and tears are proof that you are all in.
I want to encourage you first to do two things: Listen and Engage. Listen to the voices of those who share with you their holy text-the story of their lives-that tell you how they live in the world and how they are perceived in the world. If the person is of a different race, religion, gender or orientation, don’t be quick to dismiss but hear their experience for what it is – their understanding of the events as they unfolded. Engage the story. Respond to the person’s pain, frustration, hurt, outrage and humiliation. Respond to the person’s laughter, hope, success and enthusiasm. Don’t create an antiseptic environment, one where I can’t be touched for fear of infection. Rather create a place where trust and peace are the pillars supporting the actions of building God’s beloved community.
Let me share with you some things I know:
Dr. Beverly Daniel Tatum, in her book Why are all the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria? And Other Conversations About Race offers this definition: “Racism is a system of advantages based on race. And equally important, there is no systematic cultural and institutional support or sanction for the racial bigotry of people of color. In my view, reserving the term racist only for behavior committed by Whites in the context of a White-dominated society is a way of acknowledging the ever present power of differential afforded Whites by the cultural and institutions that make up the system of advantage and continue to reinforce notions of White Superiority.” It is akin to me realizing and admitting that I enjoy Male Privilege – simply because society supports and safeguards that privilege for me.
Many often have a problem with this definition, because they say, aren’t Black people racist? Don’t they sometimes judge people simply by the color of their skin? And the answer is yes, some Blacks do that. But they don’t have the institutional support or sanctions for their bigotry against Whites.
Also when we imply through Dr. Tatum’s definition that all White people are racist or benefit from white privilege, unconsciously what some people infer is “are all White people bad?” Again Dr. Tatum responds, “Definitely not. However, all White people, intentionally or unintentionally, do benefit from racism. A more relevant question is what are White people as individuals doing to interrupt racism? We all know the stereotypes, the hood wearing Klansmen or an Archie Bunker type. But what about the passive actions that allow racism to survive and thrive in our society.” We collude with racism when we allow a racist joke to be told unchecked. We collude with racism when we allow exclusionary hiring practices to go unchallenged. We collude with racism when we accept as appropriate the omission of people of color from the curriculum and we collude with racism when we avoid the difficult race-related issues that confront our times. Because racism is so ingrained in the fabric of American institutions, it is easily self-perpetuating. All that is required to maintain it- is business as usual.
The analogy that best helps me wrap my head around this is this model- at most major airports, because the gates are stretched so far apart, they have the ‘moving walkways.’ If you stay on the left [being active] you walk and are conveyed-so you get to your gate faster. Or if you stand to your right [being passive] you can just allow the walkway to do all the work-and you get to your gate but at a more leisurely pace. The question we must ask is “How do we get off the moving walkway?” Because we’re all being transported to a place we don’t want to be-how do we make a conscious choice to move in another direction instead of accepting that it’s going to be business as usual!
During the 1960’s it would be a great misperception to believe that Blacks alone accomplished the great strides achieved during the Civil Rights Movement without any outside help. On June 21, 1964, three young civil rights workers—a 21-year-old black Mississippian, James Chaney, and two white New Yorkers, Andrew Goodman, 20, and Michael Schwerner, 24—were murdered near Philadelphia, in Nashoba County, Mississippi. They had been working to register black voters in Mississippi during Freedom Summer and had gone to investigate the burning of a black church.
The first white woman killed in the Civil Rights Movement was Viola Liuzzo. Inspired by the efforts of African Americans in the South to obtain the right to vote, she left her home in Detroit and participated in the Selma-to-Montgomery, Alabama March for black voting rights in 1965. While shuttling marchers in her car, she was shot and killed on March 25 by one of the Klansmen in a nearby car. These are just a few examples of how Blacks and Whites collaborated to change the society in which they lived and gave their lives to the struggle for Civil Rights for African Americans.
WHAT WERE CATHOLICS DOING?
During that time period what were Catholics doing? The Catholic University of America has an online history of the American Catholic Experience. Here is an excerpt from the section entitled “Catholics and Civil Rights”. It states, “Catholic support for the civil rights movement was weak in the late 1950s, and only increased slowly in the early 1960s. The American Catholic Church tended to be ambivalent in its support for integration: the bishops generally supported the ideals of equality and racial justice, but were hesitant to take any steps to implement integration in their dioceses. The laity, on the other hand, especially in the South, tended to favor continued segregation.
In the years following the Montgomery bus boycott, however, white Catholics began taking a genuine interest in issues of racial and economic justice. With the major changes in Catholic cultural and institutional norms that were mandated by the Second Vatican Council in the early 1960s, white Catholics in general and professed religious in particular became much more deeply involved in political activism and racial apostolates. While the Catholic Church as an institution never played a leading role in the civil rights movement, those black and white Catholics who participated in demonstrations and spoke out concerning Catholic social teachings helped promote the cause of equality.”
It’s also important to note that in the many protests and rallies, whites and blacks, Protestants, Catholics and Jews are pictured together, marching, riding interstate buses to challenge Jim Crow laws and lending their voices to speak against a system of laws and practices that diminished and skewed the humanity of all.
Today, in asking the question of what it means to engage the questions of equality, access to quality education, healthcare and housing for Detroiters, we are again aligning ourselves with those whose voices are often overlooked and undervalued. So the conversations that take place across the racial, gender and orientation divide are invitations to lend our support, privilege, contacts and wisdom. A wisdom that promotes prophetic action to break barriers and stand in solidarity with those just looking for the basic justice that everyone deserves.
In the 1960’s the Catholic Church’s support of the Civil Rights Movement was seen as ambivalent, today what can this group of religious women and men do to make a significant impact on a system that oppresses, on structures that ignore, on an education that ill equips, on a prison system that devours our men and devastates our families…in a society that would still rather talk about one another rather than to have significant and life changing conversations with one another…how are you going to provide a different paradigm for conversations and actions for justice in integrated settings as well as in homogeneous settings?
If we participate in the Beloved Community then we are committing ourselves to accomplishing two things:
1) Allowing ourselves to be transformed by the truth,
2) Allowing the truth to speak to us through the experiences of others.
To live as a member of the Beloved Community means that you and I have to learn how to love another person, their color, gender, orientation, culture and language as much as we love our own, that we dismantle the hierarchy of races, tear down the inequality of the patriarchy, oppose discrimination of same gender loving people and build, through our words and actions, a safe and life sustaining place where the humanity of others is always basis of love and support.
I would like to end with a quote from Pierre Teihard de Chardin, S.J.
“The day will come when, after harnessing the weather, the winds, the tides, and gravitation, we shall harness for God the energies of love. And on that day, for the second time in the history of the world, man [humanity] will have discovered fire.”